November 28, 2012
Heteronormativity, fantasy, and Bitterblue – Part 1

malindalo:

In which I tackle two questions that emerged from a discussion on SLJ’s Someday My Printz Will Come blog about Kristin Cashore’s Bitterblue:

  1. What constitutes “subtlety” when it comes to describing same-sex relationships in fiction?
  2. Is it believable to have same-sex relationships in a medieval-esque fantasy world?

I have seen this critique for books a lot (generally, I don’t just mean my books, though mine as well). It was ‘too obvious,’ ‘too PC,’ the writer was trying ‘too hard’ to be inclusive. 

I remember one person saying about a book ‘gosh, having all the names for the tenants in this one apartment building be of different ethnicities was just SO OBVIOUS and self-conscious, I didn’t like that’… and I knew the writer, a friend of mine, had simply written down the names from her own apartment building.

Because writers make something clear, they’re seen as making it too obvious… but only because readers are used to seeing such things presented obliquely, as if they should not be spoken outright. (The love that dare not speak its name, but can sort of say ‘the name sounds like…’?)

It’s jarring for readers for a book to explicitly defy the default: it either jumps out to readers as discordant, or they refuse to absorb it. (Remember all the people shocked, shocked, that there were characters of colour in the Hunger Games.) So someone saying ‘a girl fancies a boy’ passes by without making much impression (of course! such is the way of the world!) but a ‘a girl fancies a girl’ is seen as Terribly Obvious. When of course, they’re the same amount of obvious: they’re both just facts. 

I am not talking about all readers, of course: I’m just talking about a readerly trend, and one that should be examined.

The sense of discomfort comes from the world, not the writing.

  1. pansyforyourthoughts reblogged this from alopexplasma
  2. tgstonebutch reblogged this from malindalo
  3. the-scribblesaur reblogged this from sarahreesbrennan
  4. sarellathesphinx reblogged this from ihavealittlefeminism
  5. watchinghour reblogged this from vikingserket
  6. talkingdarkspawn reblogged this from ihavealittlefeminism
  7. vikingserket reblogged this from metaphoricallocker
  8. aimsme reblogged this from ihavealittlefeminism
  9. ihavealittlefeminism reblogged this from medeamotheroftheyear
  10. metaphoricallocker reblogged this from medeamotheroftheyear
  11. medeamotheroftheyear reblogged this from femmescerek
  12. femmescerek reblogged this from ophiucha
  13. thellamaduo reblogged this from nappynomad and added:
    Excellent, excellent discussion
  14. rpknaves reblogged this from kateelliottsff
  15. megancrewe reblogged this from malindalo
  16. rangerose reblogged this from akumastrife
  17. ridiculousmavis reblogged this from fuckyeahlesbianliterature and added:
    Heck, women can kiss and describe their clear romantic feelings for one another and people will still read them as...
  18. bizarreserenity reblogged this from motherfuckingtea
  19. motherfuckingtea reblogged this from sarahreesbrennan and added:
    If a book was written about my life from my point of view, alot would be about me going “Eeeeeh, sexy laddeh!~” like a...
  20. cuntext reblogged this from fuckyeahlesbianliterature
  21. carnilia reblogged this from sarahreesbrennan
  22. pearlslaceandroses reblogged this from agentvictoriahand
  23. petrichorandpie reblogged this from talktomethomas
  24. talktomethomas reblogged this from annaverity
  25. dunerowl reblogged this from missivesfromghosts
  26. chriscappuccino reblogged this from missivesfromghosts
  27. sexyrelicanth reblogged this from batlesbo
  28. nighbrarian reblogged this from yaflash
  29. dreamingonlysweetly reblogged this from ellenkushner and added:
    This is an amazing read about homosexuality in fantasy novels. Very smartly written well-informed, and just some damn...